Mocking
the Mockumentary
Christopher Guest has become a living
legend and auteur through his
humorous documentary-styled fiction films, more commonly known as
“mockumentaries.” His list of award-winning pictures includes: Waiting for Guffman, Best in Show, A Mighty
Wind, and For Your Consideration.
He also starred in and co-wrote This is
Spinal Tap. Each film follows a colorful cast of characters as they
generally prepare for a final performance and the twists and turns life takes
them on along the way. Various actors have parts in more than one of Guest’s
mockumentaries, such as Catherine O’Hara, Fred Willard, Eugene Levy, Parker
Posey, John Michael Higgins, Bob Balaban, Larry Miller, and several others.
Michael Patrick Jann has also tried his hand at mockumentaries with his 1999
film Drop Dead Gorgeous, which
follows the antics of the small town citizens of Mount Rose, Minnesota and the
quest to win the town’s annual beauty pageant. But someone is out to get the
other contestants as several suspiciously die or are injured. The main stars of
the film are Kirstie Alley, Kirsten Dunst, Brittany Murphy, Amy Adams, Allison
Janney, and Denise Richards. Guest’s overall presentation of the film from
scripting to shooting to upholding a true “documentary feel” and the love of
his characters make for a far better film, especially in A Mighty Wind, than Jann’s
conspicuous mockery of small-town pageant life.
The main difference between the two
movies is the script, or lack thereof. For A
Mighty Wind and the rest of Guest’s films, the writers, usually he and
Eugene Levy, would develop the story and write out the plot, but they never
wrote a script. They would give the actors information about the scene they
were shooting and then let the actors improvise it. “It’s always amazing to hear what they come
up with,” quotes Guest in the A Mighty
Wind commentary. “It’s astonishing.” At several points in the commentary,
both Guest and Levy point out moments of exceptional improvisation, such as Fred
Willard’s scenes and Jennifer Coolidge’s quote about model trains and their
importance “because without them we wouldn’t have the big ones” (A Mighty Wind). Drop
Dead Gorgeous, on the other hand, was entirely scripted by Lona Williams.
Many looks and quirks were also scripted, such as when Kirstie Alley is
supposed to look “back to [the] camera” (Williams n.p.). Though there is creative
license to be had with these characters, there is a lot less mobility than
Christopher Guest allows. Drop Dead Gorgeous is “intended to be a
‘mockumentary’ along the lines of This is
Spinal Tap or Bob Roberts, but
the production is so obviously rehearsed that the necessary illusion of reality
fails” (Persall n.p.).
What Michael Patrick Jann does that
detracts from the somewhat cinema verite
feel of Guest’s films is enhance Drop
Dead Gorgeous with non-diegetic music. Pop songs and scores are overlaid
onto the audio accompanied by modern montages of scenery. The opening sequence
of credits and music makes it clear that this is still a Hollywood movie,
whereas Guest’s films hardly have opening credits at all. Normally just the
title is shown. No actors’ names are displayed at all. The use of non-diegetic
music throughout the movie, especially the ending scenes in which the character
of Amber Atkins discovers the statewide pageant has been cancelled reminds the
viewer that this is a movie, not an attempt at a farcical documentary.
Guest truly loves the characters he has
developed in each of his films. He spends days developing them, often with
frequent co-writer Eugene Levy, and they make sure there is a solid backstory
to each even if it is not conveyed in the film. In the audio commentary of A Mighty Wind, not once does Guest
refer to his characters as crazy or weird. The only word he uses to describe
the characters is “bizarre.” But that is because they are. The actors highlight
their characters’ eccentricities, not their flaws. No mocking comment is ever
made toward them. Michael Patrick Jann and Lona Williams, on the other hand,
have the “documentary crew” filming Mount Rose’s beauty pageant ask the
contestants questions that are clearly meant to poke fun at both pageant and
small town life, highlighting the lack of intelligence many of the characters
exhibit. “Jann and screenwriter Lona Williams don’t have any affection for
their subjects, turning each tasteless gag into a sucker punch” (Persall n.p.).
For Guest, just because a character is
neurotic (i.e. Mitch from A Mighty Wind)
does not mean that he or she is present on screen to be exploited. The neuroses
morph into laughs at the behaviors exhibited as these characters try to
accomplish their somewhat mundane tasks. There is nothing out of the ordinary
for folk musicians, dog owners, or aspiring Broadway actors to try to achieve
their dreams in the most feasible ways possible for them. But for a
mother-daughter-duo to go around killing off other beauty pageant contestants is
much more of a stretch when it comes to believability. In 1991, Wanda Holloway
was convicted of conspiring to murder her neighbor due to the fact that the
neighbor’s daughter received a spot on the school cheerleading squad over
Holloway’s daughter. Drop Dead Gorgeous
draws inspiration from this national scandal. Though this is an
out-of-the-ordinary situation, Drop Dead
Gorgeous capitalizes on this absurdity. Guest, meanwhile, draws his
inspiration from human quirks and flaws. No well-known national scandal has
ever rocked the folk music industry, the dog-showing profession, or the
small-town attempt of making a sesquicentennial musical. By drawing from the
national scandal, Jann and Williams exploit real people; Guest creates his
characters with nothing but compassion for them.
The plot of Drop Dead Gorgeous is far-fetched. Somebody successfully killing
several beauty pageant contestants and severely injuring another one is
virtually unheard of. Even Wanda Holloway did not actually murder her neighbor.
It is untrue to the characters and the world in which they live. It is too far
out there to be believable, and this detracts from the quality of the movie and
its attempt at a mockumentary, especially when compared to Guest’s. His stories
are believable and ordinary to the point of mundane; his characters make the films
funny. Nothing too far-fetched occurs to his characters; they are placed in
situations that are fairly routine for them and react accordingly. This works
wonderfully for Guest’s formula as he has cranked out successful film after
film. For Waiting for Guffman, Best in
Show, A Mighty Wind, and even the less successful For Your Consideration, what is prominent, worthwhile, and
what’s notable about Guest’s movies isn't how much humor he
and Levy wring out of their dog people and folk musicians but how much humanity….
It isn't that Guest is afraid to mock his characters; it's that he takes them
seriously, even when he's going in for the kill. (Dargis n.p.)
The presence of the
film crew in Drop Dead Gorgeous also
affects the overall quality and feel of the film. They ask the characters
questions about their lives, highlighting not-so-subtle areas of their lives
that are easy to make fun of. On occasion the viewer sees a member or two of
the camera crew or a boom mike here and there to remind the viewer that it is
supposed to be a documentary. The crew also captures certain shots or snippets
of conversation that give the viewer more insight to the goings-on in town,
specifically events dealing with the suspicious deaths that occurred. This
technique is used to push the plot along and create an air of mystery as to
“Who dunnit?” There is no suggestion as to a camera crew in any of the movies
Guest has directed. Only in This is
Spinal Tap, a mockumentary starring and co-written by Christopher Guest, is the audience aware that the film is
actually a “documentary” because in the beginning director Rob Reiner, who also
acts in this movie as “director” Marty DiBergi, tells the audience so. But Guest’s
films are more observational while Jann’s is more participatory. Each filmmaker
does include interviews with the characters, which brings in characteristics of
the expository mode of documentary filmmaking.
Each filmmaker has
similar shooting techniques. For A Mighty
Wind, Arleen Donnelly Nelson shot the “whole movie virtually handheld” (Audio Commentary). If the viewer looks
closely, he or she can see the slightest wavering of the camera, but this
imperfection suggests authenticity, even if it is fake, because it feels true
to life and is along the “same unobtrusive lines of a mainstream documentary”
(Dargis n.p.). Nobody in real life is going to have a perfectly shot film or
home video. Drop Dead Gorgeous has
mostly unwavering shots, though there are several that are clearly meant to be
oscillating up and down as the “cameraman” of the documentary film crew runs
towards or away from something.
What really brings
Guest’s films together is how involved the cast and crew are with different
aspects of the film. The actors are not just actors; they are contributors to
the entirety of the film. This chemistry and camaraderie is apparent by how
well the actors work together and the passion they have for their characters.
The crew also doubles as extras if need be. For example, in A Mighty Wind, Catherine O’Hara and
Eugene Levy (Mickey and Mitch, respectively) wrote several songs together as
did Michael McKean (Jerry Palter) and his real-life wife Annette O’Toole (she
did not act in the film). John Michael Higgins, who played Terry Bohner, was
the vocal arranger for many of The New Main Street Singers’ songs. One of the
production heads at Castlerock Entertainment is a musician for Mitch and Mickey,
and Sunday Stevens, the second assistant director, plays the stage manager at
Town Hall (Audio Commentary). By the time A Mighty Wind was made, many of the cast had collaborated on
previous films including This is Spinal
Tap, Waiting for Guffman, and Best in
Show. They had the routine down by the time A Mighty Wind was made and the passion they have for what they do
is clearly present on-screen and enhances the material. The characters in Drop Dead Gorgeous had far less
chemistry than in A Mighty Wind, and
the viewer feels that this is a typical Hollywood film in which the actors are just doing their jobs, and they are not
doing fantastic work, either. For Michael Patrick Jann, each person in the cast
or crew has a specific job and sticks to it, while for Guest the lines blur and
the collaboration makes for a better film.
The characters in
Guest’s mockumentaries are relatable, despite their neuroticisms, and the viewer
finds him- or herself empathizing with the characters. The viewer wants Corky
St. Clair (Waiting for Guffman) to
get his show to Broadway, because the viewer has been the underdog before and
knows what it feels like to strive for success in the face of adversity. The
viewer roots for the dogs and their owners in Best in Show because the viewer knows how it feels to win and wants
to experience it vicariously again through the dog show. The viewer wants Mitch
and Mickey to kiss during “There’s a Kiss at the End of the Rainbow” in A Mighty Wind because the viewer has
felt that passion and wants to reclaim it through the duo. But most of all, the
viewer wants each of the characters to succeed and finally pull it off and put
it all together because that the viewer has failed in life before, and maybe if
these characters can do it, so can the viewer.
The viewer grows to
love these characters just as much as the movie itself, because without these
specific characters, the film would probably be a flop. What would happen if
Mitch was not a neurotic, emotionally stunted man broken in pieces when he and
Mickey split up? These characters have an underlying goal to succeed, and the
struggle for that success is the truth to the films which is what makes them
still even more enjoyable. And it is through this that the viewer can see and
feel the immense love Guest has for his characters. He, like the viewer, wants
them to succeed to the best of their ability. Even if it means losing the dog
show, the character still made it that far and still tried. There is always
next year. Even if it means after Ode to Irving, the characters go their
separate ways, they still gave it one last shot and that inspired them to stay
in music, regardless of whether it is playing in a tacky casino or the new song
“Sure-Flo” at a medical convention. Even if it means not going to Broadway, the
character pulled off a small-town hit musical that will forever be remembered.
The viewer roots for these underdogs because the viewer sees himself as these
characters and this connection mocks not only the characters but the viewer as
he realizes his own neuroticisms and quirks and eccentricities. “Drop Dead Gorgeous simply manipulates
the ideas of satire without connecting to the underlying truth” (Ebert n.p.).
To put is simply:
Christopher Guest does it better, if not best. Michael Patrick Jann and Lona
Williams make a solid attempt at creating a great mockumentary but their
success borders on mediocre. The humor is there, and so is the delivery, but
the lack of love and underlying truth just does not cut it. The slapstick
comedy is less sophisticated and tackier than the subtle English dry humor
present at every turn of Guest’s films. The characters are less relatable and
the plot goes too far beyond the boundaries of believability for small-town
life in Mount Rose, Minnesota. Even if Guest is not the all-around best in
show, he still takes first prize at making mockumentaries and poignantly addressing
the viewer’s quirks as they are played out before the viewer’s eyes through the
colorful, creative, all-star cast that takes the films to a perfect level of comedy
mixed with the simple truth.
Works Cited
Audio
Commentary. A Mighty Wind.
Dir. Christopher Guest. Perf. Christopher Guest and Eugene Levy. Castlerock Entertainment,
2003. DVD.
Dargis, Manohla. "MOVIE REVIEW; Mockument to the Past;
Christopher Guest Turns His Loving
but Ruthlessly Satirical Eye on Aging Folkies." Los Angeles Times: 0. Apr 16 2003. OxResearch;
ProQuest Central; ProQuest Health Management.Web. 18 Dec. 2012 .
Ebert, Roger. "Drop Dead Gorgeous Not Drop Dead
Hilarious." Niagara Falls
Review: 0. Jul 22 1999. OxResearch; ProQuest Central;
ProQuest Health Management. Web.
18 Dec. 2012 .
Persall, Steven.
"For Laughs, Watch the Real Thing." St.
Petersburg Times 23 July
1999, Weekend; Movie Reveiw sec.: 8. LexisNexis Academic. Web. 18
Dec. 2012. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/lnacademic/?>.
Williams, Lona. "Drop Dead Gorgeous (1999) Movie Script." Screenplays for You. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Dec. 2012.
All rights reserved. All written work on this page is the sole copyright of the author, username Dani, and may not be reprinted or used in any manner whatsoever without written permission from the author. I certify that all work written here is original unless otherwise cited (such as in reference lists, etc.), and is my own. Any questions, comments, concerns, or requests for reprinting can be submitted to bookendreviews@gmail.com for review.
All rights reserved. All written work on this page is the sole copyright of the author, username Dani, and may not be reprinted or used in any manner whatsoever without written permission from the author. I certify that all work written here is original unless otherwise cited (such as in reference lists, etc.), and is my own. Any questions, comments, concerns, or requests for reprinting can be submitted to bookendreviews@gmail.com for review.
No comments:
Post a Comment